Policies

 

Filter policies

 

Starting

 

Moderate

 

Advanced

 

Robust

 

VerTebrate

Leadership & Governance

 

Infrastructure and resources


 Preparedness

 

Cooperation

 

 

Indicators

Percentage of local government budget spent on resilience building activities

 

 

 

POLICY I2R2

 

Monitor an effective use of resources to ensure the resilience building process performance

 

Description

At this stage, incentives and investment are in place to foster resilience building. At this stage, the use of resources should be monitored.

 

 

Case Studies

Riga: Heat consumption data platform for 5000+ buildings

Summary

The objective of the project was to monitor use of heat consumption, providing development opportunities for heat-providers and multi-apartment house-management companies, as well as marketing tools for NGOs working with energy efficiency issues and ESCO companies providing renovation services.

 

Laying the foundations for monitoring and evaluating a SUMP in Dresden (Germany)

Summary

To improve the mobility and quality of life for its citizens, Dresden developed a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) to meet the mobility needs of residents, businesses and the region for decades to come.

Source: http://www.eltis.org/discover/case-studies/laying-foundations-monitoring-and-evaluating-sump-dresden-germany

 

Monitoring, reporting and evaluation approach in Helsinki Metropolitan Area MRE in New York: lessons to learn for Europe as well

Summary

The Helsinki Metropolitan Area adopted its adaptation strategy in 2012. It focuses on measures that address cross-sectoral or cross-municipal impacts of climate change and can produce synergies or efficiency gains through broader collaboration. One of the actions in the strategy is creating a system to monitor annually the implementation of measures, changes in the operational environment and reporting of implementation and changes

In 2010, the New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC) issued a report proposing the development of indicators and a monitoring system (Jacob et al., 2010). It recommended that the system cover a range of quantifiable indicators relating to physical climate change variables; risk exposure, vulnerability and impacts; adaptation measures; and new research in the previous three categories. This implies an active learning element and interest in benefiting from research findings and best practices from elsewhere. It emphasised that it is important for different actors (scientists, engineers, city officials) to collaborate in defining and selecting indicators.

Source: EEA, Box 5.36, Box 5.37 

Subscribe to our newsletter

CONTACT

  Email

 Twitter


 
 LinkedIn

 

 

 

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 653569.